Einstein, bergson and the debate that changed our understanding of time. He says, the time that physicists measure by clocks, is objectively real, and so, real in a way that what he refers to philosophers time is not. Challenger to einsteins theory of time times higher. Henri bergsons debate with albert einstein swayed the. I have come across various reconstructions, which however do not seem fully satisfactory.
At the time, many thought that physics had everything figured out and it wasnt long until everything, including human behavior, could be predicted using the scientific methods of physics and relativity. It was laplace who treated time as just another dimension equivalent to space, and thereby paved the way for the development. Canales is an excellent account of the debate in the context of the league of nations and the differing political views of bergson and einstein. Confusing biological rhythms and physical clocks todays. The clash between physics and philosophy the canonical interpretation of the 1922 debate that our conference is meant to revisit is that einstein the mathematical physicist won out over bergson the philosopher by dismissing any role for. While the debate was for the most part removed from einsteins legacy, it was periodically brought up by many of bergsons followers. Bergson focused his criticism on einsteins special theory of relativity. Postscript to the bergson einstein debate the journal of. Feb 15, 2017 in 1922, albert einstein and the great french philosopher henri bergson publicly debated the nature of time.
Einstein vs bergson, science vs philosophy and the meaning. How did the debate between einstein and bergson unravel. Canales has rescued from near oblivion a fascinating, highly significant debate that is still relevant in an age which has begun uneasily to question the hegemony of science and its uncontrollable child, technology. The explosive debate that transformed our views about time and scientific truth. How did these discussions affect the unraveling of the debate. The einstein bergson debate took place in paris on april 6, 1922. On april 6, 1922, in paris, albert einstein and henri bergson publicly debated. Bergsoneinstein debate the journal of magnus opium. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time. Henri bergson 18591941 was a famous french philosopher and a nobel laureate whose theory of time relates directly to the idea of freewill.
Full text of duration and simultaneity henri bergson. According to bergson s philosophy, bergson s concept of time does not agree with the idea of presentism. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time einsteins cosmos. In 1922, albert einstein and the great french philosopher henri bergson publicly debated the nature of time. Einsteins relativity and its reception is definitely a prominent option for a casestudy aiming to highlight the impact of the sociocultural environment to the formulation of the scientific image of the world and other aspects of the worldview of a. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time, hopos. Einstein develops special and then general relativity which is confirmed by the 1919 solar eclipse making him a worldwide sensation, then bergson challenges his notions of time at a paris conference in 1922 and in the subsequent debate einstein is generally declared the winner eroding bergsons. Jul 15, 2015 animation about time based on debate april 6th, 1922 in paris between einstein and bergson. Henri bergsons family lived in london for a few years after his birth, and he obtained an early familiarity with the english language from his mother. The physicist and the philosopher is a lively and engaging account of the meaning of time in the twentieth century.
Bergsons creative evolution, published in 1907, had put him on the map, and introduced perhaps his most enduring idea elan vital. A few years before their deaths, bergson wrote about einstein, and einstein mentioned bergson one last time. The physicist and the philosopher tells the remarkable story of how this explosive debate transformed our understanding of time and drove a rift between science and the humanities that persists today. Postscript to the bergson einstein debate the journal.
It caused confusion among many of einsteins contemporaries, and not only with. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time princeton university press bergson, henri, bergson, henri louis, canales, jimena, einstein. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time jimena canales. Jul 10, 2012 this modest postscript to an earlier post owes a great deal to jimena canales paper on the bergson einstein debate, published in project muse. Einstein develops special and then general relativity which is confirmed by the 1919 solar eclipse making him a worldwide sensation, then bergson challenges his notions of time at a paris conference in 1922 and in the subsequent debate einstein is generally declared the winner eroding bergson s. This theory led to paradoxes from a common sense point of view such that bergsons thought undermined einsteins theory. On april 6, 1922, in paris, albert einstein and henri bergson publicly debated the nature of time. All im arguing is that einstein was a scientific realist. Under all interpretations though, jamais vous ne tirerez du schema.
They underlinedonce againjust how wrong the perspective of the other remained. Similarly with einstein, bergson definitively fucked up in the debate in terms of his own positive account of simultaneity, but he was also entirely right that einstein s own account did indeed leave out time in any substantive sense. Somewhat surprisingly, for einstein scholars, jimena canales takes the brief exchange between einstein and bergson in paris on april 6, 1922, as a debate that changed our understanding of time. Changed our understanding of time, by jimena canales, princeton, nj, princeton. Bergson thinks of time as duration and subjective, i. I remember, as a young, impressionable high school student, being exposed to his 1907 creative evolution, which introduced his ideas surrounding the elan vital, the vital impetus that. Whose arguments were more convincing in the einstein vs. Einstein, at least, never again publicly engaged with bergson s views, although canales points out a few instances in which he mentions bergson. At the time, many thought that physics had everything figured out and it wasnt long until everything, including human behavior, could be predicted using. Bergson is known for his arguments that processes of immediate experience and intuition are more significant than abstract rationalism and science for. Einstein considered bergson s theory of time to be a soft, psychological notion, irreconcilable with the quantitative realities of physics. Oct 04, 2016 the physicist and the philosopher is an extraordinarily rich and wideranging work. Minkowski, 1909 the concept of time became the fourth dimension2 and an integral element of the new physical worldview. One reason that the bergsoneinstein debate impacted the nobel committee to such a degree was academic politics.
Einstein considered bergsons theory of time to be a soft, psychological notion, irreconcilable with the quantitative realities of physics. A history 2009 as well as numerous articles on the history of modernity. The debate between einstein and bergson needs to be understood in the context of bergsons duree et simultaneite. Full text of duration and simultaneity henri bergson see other formats. Einstein, at least, never again publicly engaged with bergsons views, although canales points out a few instances in which he mentions bergson. Jimena canales is the author of the awardwinning the physicist and the philosopher. Albert einstein, bergsoneinstein debate, henri bergson, philosophy of science, physics and philosophy, politics and science, theory of relativity, twin paradox. While the debate was for the most part removed from einstein s legacy, it was periodically brought up by many of bergson s followers. Oct 06, 2000 bergson focused his criticism on einstein s special theory of relativity. Though time and space were separate for newton something that einstein challenged, the clock time he assumed was laid out like space and was devoid of the dynamism of bergsonian duree, bergson, 1912. Animation about time based on debate april 6th, 1922 in paris between einstein and bergson. Canales uses the 1922 debate between albert einstein and henri bergson as a starting point from which to discuss an astonishing array of thinkers, technologies, and cultural developments.
Einstein and bergson had an argument over the nature of time. Henri bergson was an actually thrilling philosopher to read. Processed on a psychosophical way, integrally with other aspects. Duration, according to bergson, is the succession of qualitatively heterogeneous psychical states, all melting together in a unity which nonetheless discloses intensive multiplicity and thus, is not static. Einstein considered bergsons theory of time to be a soft, psychological notion, irreconcilable. The einsteinbergson debate took place in paris on april 6, 1922. Einstein, bergson and the debate that changed our understanding of time 2015 and a tenth of a second. Einstein considered bergsons theory of time to be a soft, psychological notion. Einstein, bohr, and the great debate about the nature of reality albert einstein. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time bergson, henri, bergson, henri louis, canales, jimena, einstein, albert on april 6, 1922, in paris, albert einstein and henri bergson publicly debated the nature of time. The journal of the international society for the history of philosophy of science 7, no. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time jimena canales princeton univ.
Similarly with einstein, bergson definitively fucked up in the debate in terms of his own positive account of simultaneity, but he was also entirely right that einsteins own account did indeed leave out time in any substantive sense. This theory led to paradoxes from a common sense point of view such that bergson s thought undermined einstein s theory. Einstein had been invited to give a presentation in paris on his theory of relativity. Einstein considered bergson s theory of time to be a soft, psychological notion, irreconcilable. Isbn 9780691165349 in march 1924, french author andre gide opened his journal. One reason that the bergson einstein debate impacted the nobel committee to such a degree was academic politics. Although part of the debate seemed to deal with technical details e. Henri bergsons debate with albert einstein swayed the 1921. The most well known of these paradoxes is the twin paradox, in which one twin stays on earth while the other goes on a rocket journey. Henri bergsons greatgreatgrandfather, szmul jakubowicz sonnenberg, called zbytkower, was a prominent banker and a protege of stanislaw ii augustus, king of poland from 1764 to 1795. Tilman sauer, jimena canales, the physicist and the philosopher. The topic to be addressed in this paper, that is, the distinction between the concept of time and the being of the clock, divides into two parts. Pure time has a real duration which is different from mathematical time that is perceived as discrete units.
Einstein vs bergson, science vs philosophy and the meaning of. Jimena canales introduces readers to the revolutionary ideas of einstein and bergson, describes how they dramatically collided in paris, and. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time princeton university press, 2015 michael foley. Feb 23, 2017 somewhat surprisingly, for einstein scholars, jimena canales takes the brief exchange between einstein and bergson in paris on april 6, 1922, as a debate that changed our understanding of time. Almost 100 years after the einsteinbergson debate canales, 2015. This modest postscript to an earlier post owes a great deal to jimena canales paper on the bergson einstein debate, published in project muse. How albert einsteins vision transformed our understanding of space and time. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding.
299 477 1534 1061 517 1431 1290 969 173 1201 111 289 1226 186 1452 701 1574 150 356 355 32 1165 281 99 1235 1231 908 358 1207 1012 379 615 954 593 1111 44 606 1207 1072 424 735 129